Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether offences under the Indian Penal Code, when clubbed with offences under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994, could be investigated by the police and whether the FIR was liable to be quashed on the ground that the complaint had been forwarded by an officer other than the Bureau of Investigation.
Analysis: Section 4(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 makes offences under other laws triable under the Code unless the special statute contains a contrary provision regulating the manner or place of investigation, inquiry or trial. The West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994 created a Bureau of Investigation under section 7 to investigate tax evasion and related malpractices, but nothing in section 7 excluded the ordinary police from investigating cognate offences under the Indian Penal Code or from acting where such offences surfaced during the inquiry. Section 88(6) expressly makes the sales tax offence supplemental to other penalties under law, which negatives any inference that IPC offences are displaced. Quashing the FIR merely because the police were set in motion would not further the ends of criminal justice, particularly when the FIR disclosed serious cognizable offences.
Conclusion: The FIR was not liable to be quashed, and the police investigation could proceed notwithstanding the special machinery under the Sales Tax Act.