Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty could be sustained under Rule 173Q(bbb) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 in the absence of an allegation or finding that the registered dealer wilfully entered wrong or incorrect particulars in the invoice with intent to enable the buyer to avail credit of duty.
Analysis: The penalty provision applies only where a registered dealer wilfully enters wrong or incorrect particulars in the invoice issued for excisable goods with the intent to facilitate the buyer's availment of duty credit. The record did not contain any allegation or finding that the invoice contained wrong particulars entered with such intent. In the absence of the essential statutory precondition, the foundation for penalty was missing.
Conclusion: The penalty was not sustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.