Chapter note controls classification of composite cleaning bars; abrasive scouring preparations prevail over essential-character analysis.

A composite dish-wash bar was held classifiable under Heading 34.05 as a scouring preparation because its dominant composition was abrasive material, with only a smaller detergent component. Chapter Note 2 to Chapter 34 was treated as the governing classification rule for products containing abrasive powders, and the HSN explanatory notes supported classification as a utensil-scouring preparation rather than soap or an organic surface-active product. Rule 3(b) was held inapplicable because classification had to be determined first by the heading terms and the relevant chapter note. The contrary classification under Heading 34.01 was set aside and the original classification restored.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether Vim Dish Wash Bar was classifiable under Heading 34.01 as an organic surface-active product or under Heading 34.05 as a scouring preparation; (ii) Whether the classification had to be determined by applying Rule 3(b) of the Rules for the Interpretation of the Schedule or by giving primacy to Chapter Note 2 to Chapter 34.

Issue (i): Whether Vim Dish Wash Bar was classifiable under Heading 34.01 as an organic surface-active product or under Heading 34.05 as a scouring preparation.

Analysis: The product was found to be in bar form but its dominant composition consisted of insoluble abrasive such as china clay, feldspar and calcite, with only a smaller detergent component. Chapter Note 2 to Chapter 34 classifies products containing abrasive powders under Heading 34.01 only when they are in the form of bars, cakes or moulded pieces, but the HSN explanatory notes and the technical material relied upon showed that abrasive preparations containing surface-active agents, used for scouring utensils, fall under Heading 34.05. The evidence, including the chemist's report and the manufacturing composition, supported the view that the product was a scouring preparation and not soap in the commercial and technical sense.

Conclusion: The product was correctly classifiable under Heading 34.05 as a scouring preparation and not under Heading 34.01.

Issue (ii): Whether the classification had to be determined by applying Rule 3(b) of the Rules for the Interpretation of the Schedule or by giving primacy to Chapter Note 2 to Chapter 34.

Analysis: Rule 1 requires classification to be determined primarily according to the terms of the headings and the relevant section or chapter notes. Since Chapter Note 2 specifically dealt with products containing abrasive powders, resort to Rule 3(b) was unnecessary and improper. The essential character argument based on the detergent component could not override the specific statutory note and the HSN guidance. The earlier orders classifying the product under Heading 34.01 were therefore not sustainable.

Conclusion: Rule 3(b) was not applicable and Chapter Note 2 governed the classification.

Final Conclusion: The assessee's classification claim succeeded, the contrary appellate orders were set aside, and the original classification as a scouring preparation was restored.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a chapter note specifically governs classification of composite products, classification must be made under the heading mandated by that note and the HSN explanatory guidance, without resort to the essential-character test under the interpretative rules.

---