Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the official liquidator could be directed to engage counsel and defend the pending income-tax appeals and related proceedings on behalf of the company in liquidation in respect of assessments made for periods prior to the winding-up order.
Analysis: The assessments in question related to assessment years long before the winding-up order, and the appeals had already been filed by the company before liquidation. The notice under section 179 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was issued to the ex-director in her personal capacity, so it was for her to appear and contest the same. On these facts, the Court held that section 457(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956, could not be invoked to require the official liquidator to take over the defence of the ex-director or bear the expense of counsel. The Court also indicated that reassessment proceedings of this nature did not fall within the scope of legal proceedings contemplated by section 457(1)(a) as applied to the liquidation.
Conclusion: The request to compel the official liquidator to engage counsel and defend the ex-director in the tax proceedings was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 457(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956, does not require an official liquidator to defend or finance proceedings arising from pre-winding-up tax assessments against an ex-director in her personal capacity.