Tariff classification of copper mould tubes required fresh adjudication because the notification claim depended on the correct heading.

Imported copper mould tubes had to be classified by examining whether they were moulds used in metallurgy under Tariff Heading 84.54 or moulds for metal or metal carbides under Tariff Heading 84.80, because eligibility for Notification No. 187/86 depended on that classification. The authorities' brief orders failed to consider the documentary and technical material or to give a reasoned finding on the essential tariff issue. As the classification dispute was determinative of the notification claim, the appellate order could not stand. The matter was set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication by the original authority with proper consideration and a speaking order.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imported copper mould tubes were classifiable as moulds of a kind used in metallurgy under Tariff Heading 84.54 or as moulds for metal or metal carbides under Tariff Heading 84.80, and whether the benefit of Notification No. 187/86 was available on that basis.

Analysis: The authorities below had rejected the claim on very brief orders without adequately examining the documentary and technical material produced by the appellant. The record did not show a reasoned consideration of the essential classification question, namely whether the goods were ingot moulds used in metallurgy or merely moulds falling under a different tariff heading. Since the availability of the notification depended on whether the tariff description matched the goods, the classification issue had to be decided on proper evidence and with a speaking order. In the absence of such consideration, the appellate order could not stand.

Conclusion: The classification and notification claim required fresh adjudication, and the impugned orders were set aside with a direction for de novo consideration by the original authority.

---