Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether import of Beef Tallow under Open General Licence remained permissible despite a subsequent public notice canalising the goods, and whether confiscation, redemption fine, and personal penalty could be sustained once the import was held lawful.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier decision on the same commodity and held that the right to import under Open General Licence is a statutory right. A public notice placing the goods in the canalised list does not override that right and has no statutory force under Section 3 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947. As the earlier view had already been upheld by the Supreme Court, the present facts did not justify a different conclusion. Once the import was treated as lawful, the consequential order of confiscation and the associated redemption fine and penalty under the Customs Act could not survive.
Conclusion: The import was held to be permissible under Open General Licence, and the confiscation, redemption fine, and personal penalty were unsustainable.