Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Official Liquidator could be directed to disburse dividend payable to a deceased shareholder's representatives without production of a succession certificate or a certificate from the Administrator General.
Analysis: The amount claimed was a debt due to the deceased and was sought by persons asserting to be his representatives. Section 214 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 requires production of a succession certificate to establish entitlement to collect such a debt. The Tahsildar's certificate only showed relationship with the deceased and could not substitute for the statutory certificate. The procedure under the Indian Succession Act is intended to ensure that payment is made only to a duly entitled person after opportunity for objections, and that safeguard could not be bypassed. Rule 280 of the Companies (Court) Rules also supports insistence on a succession certificate, except in limited small-payment situations.
Conclusion: The application for a direction to pay the dividend without a succession certificate was not maintainable and was rejected. Payment could be made only on production of a succession certificate under Section 214 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, or an appropriate certificate from the Administrator General where permissible.