Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment was a best judgment assessment and whether penalty could be levied under section 14(3) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957.
Analysis: The turnover was determined from the material discovered during inspection. The fact that the return filed later disclosed the same figure did not convert the assessment into one made on acceptance of the return. Section 14(3) empowered the assessing authority to make a best judgment assessment and to impose penalty where the dealer had failed to file the return in time or filed it after inspection. The facts satisfied those conditions.
Conclusion: The assessment was valid as a best judgment assessment and the penalty was leviable.