Modvat credit cannot be denied for an incorrect tariff heading when revised declaration and duty-paid inputs support condonation.

Delay in filing a revised Modvat declaration could be condoned where the inputs had been received in the factory, duty had been paid, and the revised declaration supplied the full description and correct classification. Rule 57G(5) authorised the Assistant Commissioner to relax procedural compliance for recorded reasons, so credit could not be denied merely because an earlier declaration used an incorrect tariff heading or because the condonation request was said to lack particulars. On these facts, the refusal to condone the delay was unsustainable and the assessee was entitled to the credit.

---

---

Issues: Whether delay in filing the revised declaration for availing Modvat credit was liable to be condoned under the relevant rules and whether credit could be denied on the ground of an incorrect earlier tariff classification.

Analysis: The inputs had been received in the factory and the duty thereon had actually been paid. Rule 57G(5) empowered the Assistant Commissioner to condone delay for recorded reasons and permit credit even if procedural requirements were not fully complied with. The rejection was based mainly on the premise that the same inputs could not fall under a different tariff heading and on an alleged lack of particulars in the condonation request. The revised declaration, however, contained the full description and classification of the inputs, and the earlier declaration was found to have reflected an incorrect tariff heading. On these facts, the grounds for refusing condonation were not sustainable.

Conclusion: The delay in filing the revised declaration ought to have been condoned and the assessee was entitled to the credit.

---