Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the patent or proprietary medicaments cleared during the relevant period were chargeable to central excise duty in the absence of an operative exemption notification or notification under Section 11C of the Central Excise Act.
Analysis: Central excise duty is leviable on excisable goods under Section 3 of the Central Excise Act unless the goods are exempted by a notification issued under Section 5A. The relevant period was not covered by any exemption notification in force, and no notification under Section 11C of the Central Excise Act was shown to have been issued.
Conclusion: The medicaments were liable to central excise duty for the relevant period, and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of an operative exemption notification, excisable goods remain chargeable to duty under the charging provision of the Central Excise Act.