TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether an appeal under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 can be entertained by the High Court on its original side; (ii) whether such an appeal must be presented as a memorandum of appeal stating questions of law and not as a petition; (iii) whether such an appeal is to be heard by a single judge on the company side as a company matter until appropriate rules are framed.
Issue (i): Whether an appeal under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 can be entertained by the High Court on its original side
Analysis: The statutory scheme placed company jurisdiction in the High Court under sections 2(11) and 10(1), while section 10F created a limited appellate remedy on questions of law arising from the order of the Company Law Board. The existing High Court rules treated company matters as matters on the original side, and the absence of special appellate-side rules for section 10F did not displace the ordinary allocation of company jurisdiction on the original side. The reference to earlier authority on a different statutory scheme was held inapplicable.
Conclusion: Yes. The appeal under section 10F is to be entertained by the High Court only on the original side and not on the appellate side.
Issue (ii): Whether such an appeal must be presented as a memorandum of appeal stating questions of law and not as a petition
Analysis: An appeal is distinct from a petition and, by its nature, must disclose the grounds and the questions of law arising from the impugned order. The prevalent practice of presenting section 10F appeals as petitions was found inconsistent with the statutory character of the remedy. At the same time, the right of appeal being statutory, pending matters could not be rejected merely because they were filed in the wrong form, and appropriate amendments were permissible.
Conclusion: Yes. Such appeals must be presented as a memorandum of appeal stating questions of law, though pending matters filed as petitions were not to be dismissed solely on that defect.
Issue (iii): Whether such an appeal is to be heard by a single judge on the company side as a company matter until appropriate rules are framed
Analysis: In the absence of specific procedural rules for section 10F appeals, the existing classification of company matters governed their listing and hearing. Since company matters on the original side were assigned to judges under the High Court rules, the appeal was to be heard in that stream until appropriate rules were framed.
Conclusion: Yes. The appeal under section 10F is to be heard by the company court on the original side as a company matter until appropriate rules are made.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by holding that section 10F appeals lie on the original side, must be filed in appellate form as memoranda of appeal setting out questions of law, and are to be treated as company matters pending rule-making, with existing defective filings not to be thrown out merely on form.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute creates a limited appeal on questions of law from a company law order, the appeal must conform to the form of an appeal and be governed by the existing original-side company jurisdiction unless and until specific procedural rules provide otherwise.
TaxTMI 
