Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Court can, pending a winding up petition (after admission but before formal winding up order and advertisement), order the interim sale/transfer of the company's assets to prevent further loss and mitigate mounting liabilities.
Analysis: The petition and supporting facts establish that the company has been non-operational, has sustained heavy losses, liabilities exceed assets, parties are deadlocked and liabilities (including interest) are accruing daily. Section 536(2) permits that dispositions of company property after commencement of winding up are void unless the court otherwise orders; this provision does not on its face restrict the court to ordering transfers only after a formal winding up order. Section 443(1)(c) and the court's inherent powers (as recognised in precedent) permit interim orders necessary to prevent abuse of process or to secure ends of justice at the stage of admitting or entertaining a winding up petition. Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 preserves inherent judicial power. Applying these provisions and authorities to the admitted petition and the present facts, an interlocutory order permitting public tender and sale of assets, with sale proceeds deposited in court for payment to creditors, is an appropriate exercise of jurisdiction to mitigate loss and protect guarantors and creditors.
Conclusion: The application for interim sale of the company's assets is allowed; the petitioner is permitted to call for tenders by public advertisement, place tenders before the court, deposit sale proceeds in court for payment to the State Bank of India, and recover advertisement and sale expenses from the respondent-company.