Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2001 (7) TMI 1213 - HC - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Consent winding-up orders and admitted debt: article explains when they may operate as executable decrees and support insolvency action. A consent order in winding-up proceedings recording an admitted liability and a managing director's guarantee was treated as enforceable like a decree ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Consent winding-up orders and admitted debt: article explains when they may operate as executable decrees and support insolvency action.

                          A consent order in winding-up proceedings recording an admitted liability and a managing director's guarantee was treated as enforceable like a decree under section 634 of the Companies Act, 1956, enabling execution and insolvency proceedings against the guarantor under section 9 of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909. The article also states that the company court's powers under section 443 of the Companies Act, 1956, read with the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, extend to directing payment of an admitted debt to the petitioning creditor where liability is undisputed and payment was consented to. It distinguishes cases involving disputed liability and rejects objections based on fraudulent preference and lack of jurisdiction.




                          Issues: (i) Whether a consent order passed in winding-up proceedings, by which the company admitted liability and the managing director guaranteed performance, could be treated as an executable order having the force of a decree and as the basis for insolvency proceedings against the guarantor. (ii) Whether the company court had power, while dealing with a winding-up petition, to pass an order directing payment of an admitted debt to the petitioning creditor.

                          Issue (i): Whether a consent order passed in winding-up proceedings, by which the company admitted liability and the managing director guaranteed performance, could be treated as an executable order having the force of a decree and as the basis for insolvency proceedings against the guarantor.

                          Analysis: The consent terms were read as a whole. The order recorded the company's admission of liability, directed payment of the admitted amount by instalments, and required the managing director to guarantee payment and stand surety for performance of the terms. Section 634 of the Companies Act, 1956 was construed as conferring on such an order the same enforceability as a decree. On that footing, the guarantee undertaken by the managing director was held to be capable of execution under section 145 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and the order therefore answered the description of a decree or order for payment of money for purposes of section 9 of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909.

                          Conclusion: Yes. The consent order was executable in the manner of a decree, and insolvency notice could be founded on it against the respondent.

                          Issue (ii): Whether the company court had power, while dealing with a winding-up petition, to pass an order directing payment of an admitted debt to the petitioning creditor.

                          Analysis: Section 443 of the Companies Act, 1956, read with the inherent powers preserved by the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, was held to be wide enough to permit an appropriate order other than winding up itself. The court distinguished cases where liability was disputed and stressed that, where liability was admitted and the company had consented to pay, the court was not barred from making an order for payment. The earlier authorities were treated as supporting the proposition that a winding-up petition is a proper remedy for enforcement of a just debt and that an order of payment made in such proceedings is executable like a decree. The court also rejected the objections based on fraudulent preference and the supposed absence of jurisdiction to make such an order.

                          Conclusion: Yes. The company court had jurisdiction to direct payment of the admitted amount to the petitioning creditor, and such order had the force of a decree.

                          Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded, and the respondent was held liable to face insolvency proceedings on the strength of the consent order passed in the winding-up matter.

                          Ratio Decidendi: A consent order in winding-up proceedings, recording an admitted liability and a guarantee for performance, may be enforced as an executable order having the force of a decree, and the company court has power to direct payment of an admitted debt to a petitioning creditor in aid of that process.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found