Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in valuing goods captively consumed and not sold, addition of profit margin was required under Rule 6(b)(ii) of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 1975.
Analysis: The goods were not sold but were consumed captively. In such a situation, the assessable value was to be determined on the basis of cost of production. The relevant rule contemplated addition of profit, if any, but where the valuation was worked out on costing and no sale price existed, no profit element was required to be added. The lower authority had followed earlier orders on the same issue and adopted that view.
Conclusion: Addition of profit margin was not warranted, and valuation had to be fixed on the basis of cost of production without adding any profit element.
Final Conclusion: The departmental challenge to the valuation method failed, and the assessable value was upheld on a cost-based basis for captively consumed goods.
Ratio Decidendi: For captively consumed goods not sold in the market, assessable value is to be determined on cost of production without adding profit margin unless the rule specifically requires profit addition on the facts established.