Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product manufactured by the assessee was correctly classifiable as zinc dust under Chapter sub-heading 7903.10 and entitled to the benefit of the relevant exemption notification, or was liable to be treated as zinc powder under the residuary heading.
Analysis: The applicable tariff note required zinc dust to consist of spherical particles, to satisfy the prescribed sieve test, and to contain the requisite metallic zinc content. The record showed no test report from the department, while the assessee produced chemical test results showing that the goods passed the sieve test to the required extent and contained metallic zinc well above the prescribed threshold. The classification dispute could not be decided merely on the basis of the manufacturing process when the goods satisfied the tariff description and technical requirements. The earlier appellate finding that the product conformed to the tariff note and answered the description of zinc dust was therefore supported by the material on record.
Conclusion: The product was correctly classified as zinc dust under Chapter sub-heading 7903.10 and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the notification; the revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the goods satisfy the specific tariff description and technical tests in the chapter note, classification must follow the tariff entry and cannot be displaced solely by reference to the manufacturing process.