Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether assessment proceedings initiated by notice under the relevant sales tax provisions remained pending and could be completed under the ordinary assessment procedure without being barred by limitation, and whether the challenge to the impugned notices and the related writ relief could succeed.
Analysis: The notice under the assessment provisions had been issued after returns were filed, and the proceedings had not culminated in final assessment orders. The Court treated such proceedings as pending until completion of assessment and held that, for assessments under the provisions corresponding to sub-sections (2) and (3), no fixed statutory limitation barred their completion. The Court distinguished the position from best judgment assessments and from escaped turnover cases, and declined to import a rigid time limit where the statute had not prescribed one. It also held that the pending assessments should be concluded on the basis of the existing record and such further material as the authority might obtain, while emphasising expedition in tax administration.
Conclusion: The challenge failed. The assessments were permitted to be completed under the ordinary assessment provision, and the petitions were dismissed.