Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty in a customs classification dispute, and whether recovery should be stayed during pendency of the appeal.
Analysis: The dispute concerned classification of imported goods described as electric ballast with housing for compact fluorescent lamps. The applicant relied on the invoice and the testing report, while the department supported classification under a different tariff entry and invoked misdeclaration and licensing consequences. On a prima facie view of the test report, invoice, and tariff position, the applicant's claim was found to be strong enough to justify interim relief.
Outcome: Waiver of pre-deposit of the differential duty and penalty was granted, and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.