Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the administrative surcharge and price equalisation charge collected from retailers could be included in the appellant's taxable turnover under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.
Analysis: The amounts in question were liabilities of the retailers to the Government, and the appellant collected them only on behalf of the Government. The appellant acted merely as a collecting agent or conduit, and the sums so collected never formed part of the price of the goods. Since the price was separately fixed under the agreement, the collections could not be treated as turnover liable to sales tax.
Conclusion: The inclusion of the administrative surcharge and price equalisation charge in the appellant's taxable turnover was unjustified and is set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Amounts collected by a dealer merely as a collecting agent for the Government, and not forming part of the sale price, cannot be included in taxable turnover.