Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether State excise duty paid directly by C.L. II licence holders on country liquor supplied by the petitioners forms part of the sale price for the purposes of sales tax under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Analysis: Section 2(29) read with Explanation I deems duties levied or leviable under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 to be part of the sale price, irrespective of whether such duty is paid by the seller, purchaser, or any other person. The circular of the Commissioner of State Excise permitting C.L. II licence holders to remit duty merely provided a convenient mode of payment and did not shift the primary legal burden of duty from the manufacturer to the purchaser. The fact that the duty was not shown in the invoices or books of account did not alter the statutory definition of sale price. The authorities relied on by the petitioners were distinguished in view of the wider statutory language and the controlling principle that the mode of collection does not determine whether excise duty enters the sale consideration.
Conclusion: State excise duty paid by C.L. II licence holders was correctly included in the sale price, and the challenge to the demand failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the sales tax statute expressly deems excise duty to form part of the sale price, payment of that duty by the purchaser under a facility or collection arrangement does not exclude it from the taxable sale consideration.