Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether body-building activity carried on duty-paid chassis of motor vehicles amounted to manufacture of motor vehicles or only manufacture of bodies of motor vehicles, and whether Notification No. 175/86-C.E. exempted such goods.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed the binding High Court rulings holding that a person who only builds or fabricates bodies for buses and trucks on chassis supplied by customers does not manufacture motor vehicles. Such activity results only in the manufacture of bodies of motor vehicles, which fall under Heading No. 87.07 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. On that basis, the exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. was held applicable to the goods in question.
Conclusion: The classification adopted by the lower authority was not sustainable and the small scale exemption was available; the appeals were allowed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the appellants succeeded on the classification and exemption issues.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee only fabricates or builds bodies on customer-supplied chassis, the activity is manufacture of bodies of motor vehicles and not manufacture of motor vehicles, and the goods are classifiable accordingly for exemption purposes.