Rights issue discretion upheld where bona fide funding needs were shown and no mala fide dilution of shareholding appeared.

A proposed rights issue under the Companies Act, 1956 was treated as a bona fide exercise of the company's discretion where the issue was offered pro rata to existing shareholders and the record showed a genuine need for additional working capital. The Court accepted that directors have discretion in raising capital, subject to fiduciary standards, and will intervene only on proof of abuse or mala fides. Because the company demonstrated sharply increased raw material costs, a substantial interest burden, and the need to meet large orders, the material did not show any ulterior motive or intent to dilute the petitioners' shareholding. Interim restraint on the rights issue was therefore refused.

---

---

Issues: Whether the proposed issue of rights shares under section 81 of the Companies Act, 1956 was mala fide or intended to dilute the petitioners' shareholding, and whether interim restraint against the issue could be granted.

Analysis: The directors' power to decide on increase of capital and the manner of issue of shares is discretionary, though subject to fiduciary standards and judicial intervention where abuse or mala fides is shown. The Court noted that a rights issue offered pro rata to existing shareholders does not dilute shareholding if the shareholders exercise their entitlement. It further found that the company had shown a genuine business need for additional working capital because of sharply increased raw material costs, substantial interest burden on existing borrowings, and the need to meet large orders. In these circumstances, the material on record did not establish any ulterior motive, abuse of power, or lack of bona fides in the decision to raise funds through rights shares rather than further loans.

Conclusion: The proposed rights issue was held to be a bona fide exercise of the company's discretion and not a mala fide attempt to dilute the petitioners' interest; the request for restraint failed.

---