Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment orders on declared goods were invalid for want of a notification specifying the stage of taxation, and whether the quashing of the assessments precluded reassessment if the goods had not already suffered tax at an earlier stage.
Analysis: Section 15(a) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 imposes a restriction that tax on declared goods cannot exceed the prescribed rate and cannot be levied at more than one stage. Section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, as applied to Delhi, contained no guideline fixing the stage at which tax was to be levied. Although section 5A empowered the authority to specify the taxable point by notification, no such notification was produced. In that situation, the assessment orders could not stand. At the same time, quashing the assessments did not automatically eliminate the underlying liability if the goods had already been taxed at one stage or if reassessment could be made consistently with the statutory restriction.
Conclusion: The assessment orders were liable to be quashed, but reassessment was left open to ascertain whether the goods had already suffered tax at one stage and to ensure that no further tax was levied beyond the statutory limit.