Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 5A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, imposing purchase tax on declared goods, is invalid for violating article 286 of the Constitution of India and section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, where sales tax under section 5(1) was exempted under section 10 of the State Act.
Analysis: The declared goods restriction under section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, is directed against multi-point taxation and excessive incidence of tax. Section 5A was construed as an independent charging provision, but its operation was held to be conditional upon the goods being otherwise liable to tax under section 5 and upon the tax not being payable in the particular circumstances. An exemption under section 10 does not convert taxable goods into non-taxable goods; it only relieves the dealer from payment at that point. In the statutory scheme, the word "levy" in section 15 was understood in the broader sense of imposition together with collection, and section 5A did not create an impermissible second levy on the same declared goods at an unascertainable stage. The court distinguished authorities dealing with levy at more than one point and held that section 5A did not transgress the constitutional or statutory restriction.
Conclusion: Section 5A is not ultra vires article 286 of the Constitution of India or section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and the purchase tax notices were not invalid on that ground.
Final Conclusion: The writ appeals were without merit and the challenge to purchase tax on the declared goods failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a State sales tax scheme imposes purchase tax only when tax is otherwise not payable on the declared goods, an exemption from sales tax does not by itself bar the levy of purchase tax, provided the statutory scheme does not result in prohibited multi-point taxation.