Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the requirement of pre-deposit under section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 applied to goods lying in a customs warehouse and, if not, whether the appeals dismissed for non-compliance were liable to be restored.
Analysis: The goods concerned remained in the customs warehouse and continued to be under the control of the customs authorities. Section 62(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, which restricts entry into or removal of warehoused goods without permission of the proper officer, supported the view that such goods were still within customs control. On that footing, the statutory pre-deposit condition was held not to arise.
Conclusion: The dismissal order for non-compliance was set aside and the appeals were restored to their original numbers.