Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether registration of a reference under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 amounts to commencement and pendency of inquiry under section 16 so as to attract the bar under section 22 against further winding up proceedings.
Analysis: A reference made by the company under section 15 was received and subsequently registered by the Board. The registration was treated as the stage at which the Board, on consideration, had found that inquiry deserved to be made. The absence of a fixed date for further proceedings did not negate pendency of inquiry, because section 16 contemplates inquiry upon receipt of a reference and section 22 operates when such inquiry is pending. The statutory language of section 22 was treated as mandatory, and the stay of winding up proceedings followed once the inquiry stage was reached.
Conclusion: Registration of the reference was held to amount to pendency of inquiry under section 16, and the winding up proceedings were required to remain stayed under section 22.
Ratio Decidendi: Once a reference under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 is registered by the Board after consideration, inquiry under section 16 is treated as pending and the statutory bar under section 22 applies to further winding up proceedings.