Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, during the pendency of a reference before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, recovery proceedings for loan dues initiated under the Madhya Pradesh recovery law could continue without the Board's consent under section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985.
Analysis: Section 22 creates a statutory bar on proceedings for recovery of money, enforcement of security, and enforcement of guarantees in respect of loans or advances granted to an industrial company while an inquiry under section 16 is pending. The provision is intended to operate as a protective moratorium once the reference is registered and inquiry is pending. The recovery action in question was for outstanding loan dues, not a tax claim, and therefore did not fall within the limited category of claims excluded by the authorities relied upon by the respondents. The cited decisions on the point of sick-company protection support the view that such recovery proceedings cannot continue without prior consent of the Board.
Conclusion: The recovery proceedings were barred by section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 and were required to remain stayed unless consent of the Board was obtained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a reference under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 is pending, proceedings for recovery of loan dues or enforcement of a guarantee against the industrial company cannot proceed without the consent of the Board.