Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 63/87-C.E. for coated fabrics falling under Tariff sub-heading 5903.19, notwithstanding that the base fabrics used in manufacture were classified under Chapter 60.
Analysis: The issue was covered by the Larger Bench decision in Entremonde Polyecoaters Ltd., which held that where the finished product falls under sub-heading 5903.19 and the base fabric remains cotton, the duty payable is the duty on the base fabrics under Chapter 52 together with the rate prescribed by Notification No. 63/87-C.E., regardless of the classification of the base fabrics used in manufacture. Applying that binding view, the denial of the notification benefit could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 63/87-C.E., and the impugned order was set aside.