Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to the benefit of the amnesty scheme so as to avoid penalty for delayed service tax compliance, and whether the penalties imposed under sections 76, 77 and the balance penalty under section 78 could be sustained.
Analysis: The appellant had paid the service tax along with interest during the operation of the Government's amnesty scheme. The Tribunal treated the scheme as extending relief to service providers who regularised their liability within the scheme period, and followed the view that the benefit could not be denied merely because the liability was admitted and discharged during the course of the scheme. At the same time, the appellant had already paid 25% of the penalty under section 78, and that amount was not refundable.
Conclusion: The penalties imposed under section 76, the balance penalty in excess of 25% under section 78, and the penalty under section 77 were set aside. The appellant retained the benefit of the scheme, while the amount already paid towards 25% penalty under section 78 was not disturbed.