Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether plastic laminated films consisting of layers of LLDPE and polyethylene sandwiching aluminium foil were classifiable under Heading 39.20 or Heading 76.07 of the Customs Tariff Act.
Analysis: The composition of the goods was not in dispute, but the competing tariff entries had to be applied to a composite product having both plastic and aluminium components. Technical literature showed that aluminium foil supplied barrier properties, while the plastic layers contributed heat-sealability, strength and other packaging functions. On the material before it, the Court found that neither component could be said with certainty to provide the essential character of the goods. In that situation, the interpretative rules required recourse to the residual rule of classification under which the heading occurring last in numerical order among equally competing headings is to be adopted.
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under Heading 76.07, and the assessee succeeded on the classification issue.