Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-deposit of the penalty demanded under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 should be waived and recovery stayed during the pendency of the appeal, in view of the appellant's claim to the benefit of Notification No. 64/88 for import of a CT scanner by a charitable hospital.
Analysis: The appellant claimed that no charges were collected from outpatients for treatment, except a nominal registration fee of Rs. 2, and relied on the position that such a small collection would not, by itself, defeat the benefit of the concessional notification where free treatment was otherwise provided. The order noted the earlier prima facie view that collection of a small registration amount did not necessarily deprive the institution of the notification benefit.
Outcome: The deposit of the penalty was waived and recovery of the penalty was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.