Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner (Appeals) was justified in rejecting the appeal as time-barred without putting the assessee on notice and whether the order was liable to be set aside on the ground of breach of natural justice.
Analysis: The appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) had disclosed the date of communication of the original order and, on that basis, was filed within limitation. The notice of hearing did not indicate any proposal to reject the appeal on limitation, and the assessee was not given an opportunity to address that issue. Rejecting the appeal solely on limitation without notice or hearing on that point constituted a breach of natural justice.
Conclusion: The impugned order rejecting the appeal as time-barred was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for decision afresh after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard on limitation and the other issues.