Foreign exchange exemption depends on residence status, and a foreign national domiciled abroad may remain outside repatriation liability.

Exemption under the foreign exchange notification turned on whether a foreign national fell within the class of persons resident in India for repatriation obligations. The material showed a Belgian passport, domicile in Belgium, and only year-to-year foreigner registration in India, without proof of an intention to stay for an uncertain period. On those facts, the wider construction of residence was not established, and the exemption under clause (iii) of the first proviso remained available. The finding that the person was not permanently resident in India was not displaced, so the exemption-based exoneration was maintained.

---

---

Issues: Whether the respondent, a foreign national, was entitled to exemption under clause (iii) of the first proviso to the notification dated 25.09.1958, and whether he could be treated as a person resident in India for the purpose of the foreign exchange repatriation obligation.

Analysis: The exemption depended on whether the respondent fell within the class of persons in, or resident in, India to whom the notification applied. The material on record showed that the respondent held a Belgian passport, his place of domicile was in Belgium, and his stay in India was under foreigner registration certificates renewed from year to year. The available facts did not establish that he intended to stay in India for an uncertain period so as to attract the wider meaning of residence urged by the appellant. In the absence of a factual foundation to displace the finding that he was not permanently resident in India, the exemption clause remained applicable.

Conclusion: The respondent was entitled to the exemption under clause (iii) of the first proviso to the notification, and the appellant failed to dislodge that finding.

Final Conclusion: The appeal did not succeed and the exemption-based exoneration on charges relating to foreign exchange repatriation was maintained.

Ratio Decidendi: A foreign national domiciled outside India and not shown, on the evidence, to intend to stay in India for an uncertain period remains entitled to the exemption under the notification governing foreign currency balances.

---