Natural justice in customs adjudication: failure to consider SITRA evidence led to remand for fresh decision.

Failure to consider the appellants' SITRA test results and technical opinion on the nature of the goods made the adjudication vulnerable to challenge. In a dispute affecting duty liability, the authority was expected to examine the evidence produced by the appellants and, where necessary, secure rebuttal evidence or chemical testing from the Revenue. The omission to deal with that material was treated as a prima facie breach of natural justice. The existing adjudication was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision after giving the appellants an opportunity to reply and issuing a speaking order.

---

---

Issues: Whether the impugned order could be sustained when the appellants' SITRA test results and opinion were not considered, and whether the matter required remand for fresh adjudication.

Analysis: The appellants had produced test results and technical opinion from SITRA to support the distinction between fibre waste and waste. The impugned order contained no reference to these materials. In a dispute turning on the nature of the goods and their duty liability, the adjudicating authority was expected to consider the evidence produced by the appellants and, if necessary, to have the Revenue lead rebuttal evidence or obtain chemical testing. The absence of such consideration amounted to a prima facie violation of natural justice and justified setting aside the existing adjudication for reconsideration. The Tribunal also directed that the appellants be given an opportunity to reply and that the matter be decided afresh by a speaking order.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee to the extent that the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after considering the appellants' evidence.

---