Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2002 (1) TMI 455 - Commission - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Customs duty settlement: Rs. 1,23,33,557 imposed, Rs. 50 lakh penalty, immunity granted, payment due in 30 days The Commission settled the case by determining a total customs duty of Rs. 1,23,33,557/-, imposing a penalty of Rs. 50 lakhs on the applicant. The ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Customs duty settlement: Rs. 1,23,33,557 imposed, Rs. 50 lakh penalty, immunity granted, payment due in 30 days

                            The Commission settled the case by determining a total customs duty of Rs. 1,23,33,557/-, imposing a penalty of Rs. 50 lakhs on the applicant. The applicant was granted immunity from prosecution and interest charges under various acts. The applicant was directed to pay the remaining amount and penalty within 30 days, with the order being void if obtained through fraud or misrepresentation.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Duty liability and interest charges.
                            2. Financial position and payment installments.
                            3. Fulfillment of export obligations.
                            4. Jurisdiction and eligibility of the application.
                            5. Calculation of duty liability.
                            6. Penalty and immunity from prosecution.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Duty Liability and Interest Charges:
                            The applicant admitted a duty liability of Rs. 1,23,81,895/- but later revised it to Rs. 1,16,49,093/-. The applicant contested the interest charges on the duty demanded, citing that interest could only be charged under statutory provisions. The Commission agreed that interest could only be charged after the determination of duty under Section 28AA of the Customs Act, 1962, and thus, interest was not applicable until the duty liability was determined by the Commission.

                            2. Financial Position and Payment Installments:
                            The applicant highlighted financial difficulties, including loans from Corporation Bank and Industrial Development Bank of India, and requested to pay the duty liability in four equal installments. The Commission allowed the applicant to pay Rs. 20 lakhs initially and submit financial documents for further consideration of installment payments. The applicant complied by paying Rs. 20 lakhs and later Rs. 12,98,093/-.

                            3. Fulfillment of Export Obligations:
                            The applicant faced issues with fulfilling the export obligation due to market conditions and sought to include deemed exports and third-party exports in the calculation. The Commission required the applicant to provide legible certified copies of shipping bills and obtain a certificate from DGFT to verify export obligations. The applicant admitted to miscalculations and agreed to the DGFT's computation of duty liability at Rs. 1,21,90,562/-.

                            4. Jurisdiction and Eligibility of the Application:
                            The Revenue argued that the application did not disclose any new duty liability and should be rejected. However, the Commission allowed the application to proceed, directing the applicant to pay an initial amount and submit financial documents for further consideration.

                            5. Calculation of Duty Liability:
                            The Revenue calculated the duty liability at Rs. 1,23,33,557/-, which was slightly higher than the DGFT's provisional figure. The Commission accepted the Revenue's calculation for final settlement. The applicant's inconsistent disclosures and incorrect calculations in Indian Rupees instead of US Dollars were noted.

                            6. Penalty and Immunity from Prosecution:
                            The Commission imposed a penalty of Rs. 50 lakhs on the applicant for inconsistent disclosures and lack of full and true disclosure. However, the applicant was granted immunity from prosecution under the Customs Act, 1962, the Indian Penal Code, and the Foreign Trade (Regulation) Act for matters covered in the application. The Commission also provided immunity from interest charges under the Customs Act, 1962, as there was no provision for charging interest under the applicable notification.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Commission settled the case for a total customs duty of Rs. 1,23,33,557/-, imposed a penalty of Rs. 50 lakhs, and granted immunity from prosecution and interest charges. The applicant was directed to pay the balance amount and penalty within 30 days, with the order becoming void if obtained by fraud or misrepresentation.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found