Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 16/97-C.E. was available to the assessee when Modvat credit was availed after the assessee had started paying duty at tariff rate pursuant to an earlier departmental adjudication order.
Analysis: The assessee had been denied small scale exemption in an earlier adjudication and, on that basis, was required to pay duty at the tariff rate. The record showed that the assessee did not voluntarily opt out of the notification, but paid duty under protest because the departmental order had treated the goods as ineligible for exemption. In these circumstances, the subsequent availing of Modvat credit could not be treated as a voluntary breach of the notification condition. A demand founded only on alleged contravention of condition No. 2(iii) of the notification could not be sustained where the assessee's conduct was compelled by the departmental order itself.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 16/97-C.E., and the demand of duty and penalty were unsustainable.