Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the condition of pre-deposit of duty and penalty should be dispensed with pending appeal.
Analysis: The appellants were seeking waiver of pre-deposit in a duty demand arising under Rule 57CC. The Tribunal recorded that it was not prima facie satisfied with the merits, but took note of the appellant's status as a sick industrial unit declared by BIFR and the fact that a revival package was under consideration. On that basis, and considering the high amount involved, the Tribunal found it to grant waiver of pre-deposit and to fix the appeal for hearing out of turn.
Conclusion: The condition of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was dispensed with in favour of the appellant.
Final Conclusion: Interim relief was granted and the appeal was directed to be heard on a priority basis, while the substantive controversy remained pending.
Ratio Decidendi: Waiver of pre-deposit may be granted where the appellant shows a prima facie case is not decisive, but the financial hardship and sick-unit status justify interim relief pending appeal.