Reasonable doubt and inapplicable confiscation provisions led to cancellation of penalty and release of the seized bicycle.

Reasonable doubt arising from the appellant's denial and the surrounding circumstances made the personal penalty unsustainable, so it was set aside. The confiscation of the bicycle under Sections 111(b) and 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 was also unsustainable because those provisions were held inapplicable to the vehicle, and the bicycle was directed to be released. The governing principle stated was that penalty and confiscation cannot be maintained where the factual matrix creates doubt and the statutory provisions invoked do not apply to the seized vehicle.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the personal penalty of Rs. 2,500 imposed on the appellant was sustainable. (ii) Whether the bicycle confiscated under Section 111(b) and Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 was liable to confiscation.

Issue (i): Whether the personal penalty of Rs. 2,500 imposed on the appellant was sustainable.

Analysis: The appellant had denied recovery of the foreign currency from him and had maintained the same stand in his statement before the Customs authorities. The surrounding circumstances and the explanation offered created doubt as to the allegation against him.

Conclusion: The personal penalty was not sustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the bicycle confiscated under Section 111(b) and Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 was liable to confiscation.

Analysis: The confiscation was ordered under provisions applied to the imported goods, but those provisions were held inapplicable to the vehicle in question.

Conclusion: The confiscation of the bicycle was not sustainable and the bicycle was directed to be released in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded to the extent of setting aside the personal penalty and ordering release of the bicycle, while the remaining relief was not granted.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the factual matrix creates reasonable doubt and the statutory confiscation provisions are inapplicable to the seized vehicle, penalty and confiscation cannot be sustained.

---