Exemption for medical equipment and limitation defence sustained in prima facie review of imported prosthesis and accessories

Heart valve prosthesis, its accessories and sterile storage containers were treated as prima facie covered by the exemption for medical equipment listed in Notification No. 23/98, because the prosthesis was specified in the list and the ancillary items appeared connected to its sterile use. Running-length plastic tubings were not treated as identifiable parts or accessories of a heart lung machine in that imported form. The demand was also held prima facie not barred by limitation, as the invoices and bills of entry disclosed the nature of the goods and suppression was not clearly established. Pre-deposit of the remaining duty and penalties was waived and recovery stayed.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether heart valve prosthesis, its accessories and sterile storage containers were prima facie covered by the exemption under Notification No. 23/98; (ii) whether running-length plastic tubings could prima facie be treated as identifiable parts or accessories of the heart lung machine; (iii) whether the demand was prima facie barred by limitation.

Issue (i): Whether heart valve prosthesis, its accessories and sterile storage containers were prima facie covered by the exemption under Notification No. 23/98.

Analysis: The exemption applied to medical equipment specified in List 22 and to accessories of such equipment. Heart valve prosthesis was specified in the list. On the material before the Tribunal, the imported goods appeared to be heart valve prosthesis used for implantation in human hearts. The Tribunal also treated the collets and the plastic containers required for sterile storage and further sterilisation as prima facie accessories or ancillary items connected with the prosthesis.

Conclusion: Prima facie covered by the exemption, in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether running-length plastic tubings could prima facie be treated as identifiable parts or accessories of the heart lung machine.

Analysis: Although the tubing, after being cut to size, may be used with the machine for carrying arterial and venous blood, it was imported in running lengths. In that form, it was not easy to regard it as an identifiable part or accessory of the heart lung machine.

Conclusion: Prima facie not covered as identifiable parts or accessories, against the assessee.

Issue (iii): Whether the demand was prima facie barred by limitation.

Analysis: The invoices filed with the bills of entry disclosed the nature of the goods, and the goods were cleared on that basis. On the record, suppression was not clearly made out, so the plea of limitation was considered prima facie sustainable.

Conclusion: Prima facie barred by limitation, in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: Pre-deposit of the remaining duty and penalties was waived and recovery was stayed, with the assessee receiving substantial interim relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the import documents disclose the nature of the goods and the goods are prima facie identifiable as exempt medical equipment or accessories, exemption and limitation defences may justify waiver of pre-deposit.

---