Transaction value cannot be rejected for customs valuation without evidence justifying enhancement of imported goods' declared value.

Declared customs value could not be enhanced on the basis of a market publication alone where there was no evidence of contemporaneous imports of identical or similar goods and no circumstance under the Customs Valuation framework justifying rejection of the transaction value. The Department's reliance on Metal Bulletin prices was insufficient to displace the importer's declared value without supporting material. In the absence of grounds permitting rejection of transaction value, enhancement of assessable value was unsustainable, and the appeal failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the declared customs value of imported goods could be enhanced in the absence of evidence of contemporaneous imports or any circumstance permitting rejection of the transaction value.

Analysis: The Department sought enhancement of value by reference to prices in the Metal Bulletin, but no material showed imports of identical or similar goods at a comparable price. The absence of any circumstance prescribed under the Customs Valuation framework for disregarding the declared transaction value was fatal to the enhancement. In these circumstances, reliance on the market publication alone was insufficient to displace the importer's declared value.

Conclusion: The declared value could not be rejected, and the enhancement was unsustainable. The appeal failed.

---