Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a person engaged in growing rubber trees, collecting latex, converting it into sheets, and selling the sheets to customers outside the State is a dealer within the meaning of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Analysis: The liability to tax had to be determined under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The statutory definition of "dealer" in section 2(b) requires carrying on the business of buying and selling goods. On the facts, the activity of growing rubber trees, collecting latex, converting it into sheets, and marketing the sheets did not amount to carrying on such business within the meaning of the Act.
Conclusion: The assessee was not a dealer under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and the appeal failed.