Lead scrap classification and valuation: declared transaction value sustained where Revenue lacked reliable contemporaneous import evidence.

Imported lead scrap was held to be hard lead scrap with impurities, and the classification under the relevant ISRI specification was not justified because the original authority gave no adequate reasons. The declared transaction value also could not be rejected or enhanced, as the Revenue did not produce reliable contemporaneous import evidence and the market quotations relied on were insufficient to displace the factual findings on record. The Commissioner's valuation was sustained, the Order-in-Original was upheld in substance, and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imported lead scrap was correctly classified and whether the declared transaction value could be rejected and enhanced on the basis of contemporaneous imports and the market quotations relied upon by the Revenue.

Analysis: The Tribunal found that the original authority had not given reasons for treating the goods as falling within the ISRI specification or for discarding the declared value. The chemical examination showed the scrap to be hard lead scrap containing impurities, and the Revenue had not produced reliable contemporaneous import evidence to justify enhancement. The relied upon market material was not sufficient to displace the Commissioner's factual findings or the declared price.

Conclusion: The rejection of the Order-in-Original was upheld, and the valuation adopted by the Commissioner was sustained. The Revenue's appeal was rejected.

---