Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assembled central air-conditioning plant was marketable goods for the purpose of duty, and whether the applicant was entitled to waiver of deposit and stay of recovery.
Analysis: The application concerned duty, penalty and redemption fine imposed on the footing that the components, when assembled in the department store, constituted a central air-conditioning plant. The Tribunal noted the contention that the plant could not be removed or sold as such without dismantling and that the components alone could be taken apart. On a prima facie view, the relevant question was marketability of the plant as a whole, not merely whether it was movable or immovable. The Tribunal found that the plant appeared incapable of being removed and refitted elsewhere without disturbing its components, and treated the matter as prima facie covered by the cited Supreme Court decision.
Outcome: Waiver of deposit of duty, penalty and redemption fine was granted, and recovery was stayed.