Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a cooling tower used for cooling moulds employed in an injection moulding machine qualified for benefit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that peripheral machinery which processes machinery or inputs and makes them ready for manufacture of final products has been treated as admissible in prior decisions. It applied the same approach to the cooling tower, treating it as equipment essential to the completion of the manufacturing process and integrally connected with the manufacture of the final products.
Conclusion: The cooling tower was held eligible for the benefit under Rule 57Q, and the assessee succeeded.