Personal penalty for alleged smuggled betel nuts set aside after finding no foreign-origin evidence.

Personal penalty for alleged sale of smuggled betel nuts was unsustainable because the connected matter had already found no evidence that the goods were of foreign origin and had treated them as Indian origin. Once the confiscation and penalty against the main noticee were set aside on that basis, the foundation for treating the goods as smuggled and for imposing penalty on the present appellant disappeared. The personal penalty was therefore set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether personal penalty imposed for alleged sale of smuggled betel nuts was sustainable when the goods had already been held to be of Indian origin and there was no evidence of foreign origin.

Analysis: The Tribunal noted that in the connected matter arising from the same facts and the same order-in-original, the confiscation of the betel nuts and the personal penalty on the main noticee had already been set aside on the finding that there was no evidence to show that the betel nuts were of foreign origin. In that view, the basis for treating the goods as smuggled and for fastening penalty on the present appellant did not survive.

Conclusion: The personal penalty was unsustainable and was set aside.

---