Locus standi in amalgamation meetings and lack of class approval can end the scheme process at the pre-sanction stage.

In scheme of amalgamation proceedings under section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, a transferor company cannot intervene unless it shows a legally sustainable interest; absent material showing fraud or a cognisable defect in the circulated statement, its objections to convening the meetings are not entertained. Where the unsecured creditors' and shareholders' meetings fail for want of quorum and the secured creditors vote against the scheme, the chairman's report is recorded and no further step is taken at the pre-sanction stage. In such circumstances, the application is closed because the requisite class approval for the scheme is lacking.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the transferor company had locus standi to intervene and challenge the convening of the meetings and the circulation of the statement under the scheme of amalgamation. (ii) Whether, after the meetings were held and the secured creditors voted against the scheme while the other meetings failed for want of quorum, the chairman's report was to be recorded and the application closed.

Issue (i): Whether the transferor company had locus standi to intervene and challenge the convening of the meetings and the circulation of the statement under the scheme of amalgamation.

Analysis: The application for convening meetings was made under Rule 67 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 read with section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956. The statement circulated under section 393(1) was required to present a true and accurate picture to the members and creditors. In the absence of material showing fraud or a legally cognizable defect in the statement, the Court declined to enquire into the alleged want of bona fides. Since the transferor company had not yet commenced any proceedings in furtherance of the scheme within the jurisdiction of the Court, it could not compel the amalgamation through intervention in these proceedings.

Conclusion: The transferor company had no locus standi to intervene, and its objections were not entertained.

Issue (ii): Whether, after the meetings were held and the secured creditors voted against the scheme while the other meetings failed for want of quorum, the chairman's report was to be recorded and the application closed.

Analysis: The report showed that the unsecured creditors' meeting and the shareholders' meetings could not proceed for want of quorum, and the secured creditors voted unanimously against the scheme. In the absence of approval of the scheme by the requisite classes of persons, the Court had no further role to play at that stage. The circumstances did not justify proceeding further under section 391(3) of the Companies Act, 1956.

Conclusion: The chairman's report was recorded and the application was closed.

Final Conclusion: The decision ended the company application at the pre-sanction stage because the scheme of amalgamation did not secure the necessary class approval and the intervening objections were not maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi: In proceedings for convening meetings and considering a scheme of amalgamation, a party without a legally sustainable interest has no locus standi to obstruct the process, and in the absence of class approval the Court cannot advance to sanction proceedings.

---