Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

GST Refund-inverted tax structure – where input and output supplies are same

Chethan Kumar
Private Company Wins GST Refund Dispute Against Union of India; Court Rules in Favor of Section 54(3)(ii) In a case involving a private company versus the Union of India and other tax authorities, the Gauhati High Court addressed a dispute over a GST refund related to an inverted tax structure. The company supplied IT products to government and educational institutions, seeking a refund for accumulated input tax credit. The refund was initially denied because the input and output supplies were identical, as clarified by a 2020 circular. However, the court ruled that under Section 54(3)(ii) of the CGST Act, refunds are permissible when input tax rates exceed output tax rates, disregarding the circular's provisions. (AI Summary)

In BMG INFORMATICS PVT. LTD., VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS., THE COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX GUWAHATI, THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CGST CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS GUWAHATI, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE DIVISION II [2021 (9) TMI 472 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT]:

1. Information technology products were supplied to Government Departments, PSU and to other Research and Educational Institutes located in the North Eastern region availing benefit in terms of The Notification 45/2017-Central Tax (Rate).

2. Refund application was filed under the category - ITC accumulated due to inverted tax structure and the refund application was rejected on the ground that the input and output being the same does not get covered under the provisions of clause (ii) of sub-section (3) of section 54 and as per the clarification issued by Circular No.135/05/2020-GST.

3. Hon’ble GAUHATI HIGH COURT held that:

in view of the clear unambiguous provisions of Section 54(3) (ii) providing that a refund of the unutilized input tax credit would be available in the event the rate of tax on the input supplies is higher than the rate of tax on output supplies, we are of the view that the provisions of paragraph 3.2 of the circular No.135/05/2020-GST dated 31.03.2020 providing that even though different tax rate may be attracted at different point of time, but the refund of the accumulated unutilized tax credit will not be available under Section 54(3)(ii) of the CGST Act of 2017 in cases where the input and output supplies are same, would have to be ignored.

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles