Just a moment...

Top
Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Payment for ‘Background screening and investigation services’ is neither Fees for Technical Services (“FTS”) nor royalty

Vivek Jalan
Background screening and investigation services are not royalty or fees for technical services; payments therefore are not taxable as such. Payments for background screening and investigative due diligence services do not qualify as royalty or fees for technical services. The Royalty test requires consideration for the use of, or right to use, a copyright; acquiring a product without a licence does not satisfy that test, following the SC precedent cited. The FTS test requires imparting commercial experience, skill, know how or making technical processes available to the client; pure verification, checks and reporting that do not transfer technical knowledge fail that test. Consequently, payments to non resident providers of pre employment background screening are neither royalty nor FTS under the discussed authorities. (AI Summary)

The definition of Royally requires that the consideration received must be for the use of or right to use, any copyright of a literary artistic, or scientific work. As envisaged in the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of ENGINEERING ANALYSIS CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE PRIVATE LIMITED Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. - 2021 (3) TMI 138 - Supreme Court, Important is that payments should be made for acquiring the right to use the copyright in the product and not the product itself.

For qualifying as FTS, the information provided should involve imparting of any kind of commercial experience, skill or expertise. The report should impart some information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience to the clients for the service to be called FTS. Further the service should make available a technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to the clients.

The question in the case of HireRight Ltd. Versus ACIT, Circle 2 (1) (1), International Taxation, New Delhi - 2023 (9) TMI 478 - ITAT DELHI was whether payment for ‘background screening and investigation services by a non-resident to its customers in India fall within the purview of Fees for Technical Services (“FTS”) or royalty?’. The scope of the job was that the service provider provides human resource background screening services including pre-employment background screening, employment, education, verification services and investigative due diligence services. It verifies the details in respect of the concerned candidate viz. i) educational verification ii) employment verification iii) professional reference iv) other checks including but not limited to global sanction check, criminal check, drugs test, etc.

The above service was not to use a copyrighted product and did not make available a technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to the clients. Hence the payment was neither considered towards royalty or FTS. This is quite a succinct but effective judgement and the ratio may be useful in such cases.

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles