Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

IGST on Oxygen Concentrator Negative approach of CBIC vis-a-vis Article 14, Constitution

OmPrakash jain
Criticism of CBIC's High IGST on Oxygen Concentrators During COVID-19, Alleged Violation of Article 14 The article criticizes the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) for imposing high Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on oxygen concentrators imported between March 1, 2021, and June 13, 2021, for personal use during the COVID-19 pandemic. It argues that this approach contradicts a Delhi High Court ruling and violates Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, which ensures equality before the law. The article highlights the government's failure to exempt these medical imports from IGST and questions the classification of oxygen concentrators as drugs under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. (AI Summary)

Sir,

The notfns issued by CBIC on 14.6.2021 are totally revenue oriented & are against the ratio decidendi  of Delhi High court judgment in the case of GURCHARAN SINGH VERSUS MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) , GOVERNMENT OF INDIA [2021 (5) TMI 742 - DELHI HIGH COURT], against  which the Govt. has intentionally obtained stay in the case ofMINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) , GOVERNMENT OF INDIA VERSUS GURCHARAN SINGH [2021 (6) TMI 595 - SC ORDER].

The CBIC is silent over;

i) thousands of cases where Oxygen Concentrator were imported during the period from 1.3.2021 to 13.6.2021 on payment of  28%/12% IGST & gifted for  personal use in the wake of covid pandemic, where the Govt. was under positive obligation to take ameliorative measures to protect and preserve the health of Citizens of India. The Govt. did no take any steps to exempt levy of exorbitant IGST levied on Citizens of India. Such step of the Govt. at the health cost of Citizens of India is against Article 14, Constitution of India.

ii) Quashing the notfn no. 30/2021-Customs dated 1.5.2021, ordered by Delhi High Court, which imposed IGST on Oxygen Concentrator, imported by individuals and are received by them as gifts for personal use.

iii) Refund of IGST ordered by the Delhi High Court, to individuals who imported Oxygen Concentrator by paying exorbitant IGST during the period from 1.3.2021 to 13.6.2021.

iv) Classification of Drug─The definition of drugs given in S.3(b), Drugs and Cosmetics Act would include medical equipment such as an oxygen concentrator which is used inter alia in the treatment, mitigation, and/or prevention of the disease [i.e., coronavirus].

Similarly many burning questions prevail over taxing individuals heavily by the CBIC over Covid supplies/Medicines administered to fight against prevention of  covid pandemic during the period from 1.3.2021 to 13.6.2021.

---------

Om Prakash Jain s/o J.K.Jain Tel 9414300730

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles