Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

CAS-4 apply prospectively and also for the period prior to issue of Board’s Circular

Rakesh Singh
Cost Accounting Standard 4 excludes selling and corporate overheads from valuation of captively consumed goods, affecting assessable value. CAS-4 prescribes that cost of production for captively consumed goods includes production-related costs (material, direct wages, direct expenses, works overheads, quality control, R&D, packing and production administrative overheads) but excludes selling and distribution costs, head office corporate administrative expenses and interest; CESTAT held CAS-4 applies to periods prior to the Board communication for assessments pending at adoption, and an administrative clarification confirmed finalized assessments prior to adoption need not be reopened. (AI Summary)

Provisions of CAS-4 apply prospectively and also for the period prior to issue of Board’s Circular

CCE Nashik Versus Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. 2015 (12) TMI 1353 - CESTAT MUMBAI

ISSUES:

1. Inclusion of selling and distribution of expenses and the corporate office expenses during the period October 1997 to June 2000 to clear parts of motor vehicle to their own sister concern;

2. It was the case of the Revenue that respondent should have included the cost of selling and distribution expenses and expenses incurred by the corporate office in the assessable value;

Held:

1. . We find that the issue is no more res integra inasmuch as in the recipient’s own case for the earlier period, this Bench on an appeal filed by Revenue on identical issue, held that the provisions of CAS-4 will apply not only prospectively but also for the period prior to issue of Board’s Circular dated 13.02.2003. We reproduce the relevant paragraphs.

“ The case was adjudicated by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Nasik vide order dated 27.04.06 (referred supra). The learned Commissioner observed that the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India had issued Accounting Standards 2 (AS 2) for the purposes of determination of cost of production in a case of stock transfer of goods. Similarly the Institute of Cost and Works Accountants of India had also issued guidelines (CAS 4) for determination of cost of production wherever the goods are captively consumed are not sold. As per these guidelines, especially CAS-4, can be included in the cost of production is the cost of Material Consumed, Direct Wages and Salaries, Direct Expenses, Works Overheads, Quality Control Cost, Research & Development Cost, Packing cost, and Administrative Overheads relating to production. Administrative Overheads relating to other activities such as marketing, projects management, corporate office expenses etc. cannot be included in the cost of production. The CBEC itself had issued a Circular No. 692/08/2003-CX dated 13.2.2003 wherein they had directed that cost of production of captively consumed goods will henceforth be done strictly in accordance with CAS-4,. On this basis, the learned Commissioner came to the conclusion that Head office administrative expenses, selling and distribution costs, interest etc. are not includable in the assessable value of product used in captive consumption. As regards expenses on account of research and development charges, the same is includable in the cost of production as per the Chartered Accountant Certificate produced by the assessee. The same cost has already been included in the cost of vehicle which is the final product and not included in the cost of individual component. In this view of the matter the Commissioner dropped the demand raised in the show-cause notice and also dropped the charges of penalty and recovery of interest. The department is in appeal before us against that order.

The only argument adduced is that the CBEC Circular dated 13.2.2003 is applicable only prospectively and not retrospectively and prior to 13.2.2003, the cost has to be computed on the basis of Circular dated 13.10.96 and, therefore, head office administrative expenses, interest charges and selling and distribution expenses are includable in the assessable value. In other words what is stated is that CAS-4provisions will not apply prior to 1.3.2003.”

2. In view of the foregoing, we hold that the impugned order is correct and legal and does not suffer from any infirmity. The appeal is devoid of merits and is rejected. Cross Objection filed by the respondent is also disposed of.

Note by the author:

In this context a clarification was issued by the Chief Commissioner, Chennai, Zone stating that cases which have been finalized prior to 13.2.2003 should not be opened for application of CAS-4. The extracts of the letter is being reproduced below in order to take note of the same:

‘Copy of letter C.No. IV/16/92/2003-Cx.Pol dated 05.09.2003 of this office.

Please refer to the Board’s circular No. 692/8/2003-CX-I (F.No. 6/29/2002- CX-I) dated 13.02.2003 communicating acceptance of cost Accounting Standard-4 (CAS-4) for the purpose of valuation of the excisable goods which are captively consumed under Rule 8 of Central Excise Valuation (Determination of price of Excisable goods) Rules, 2000.

The field formations have raised certain doubts as to whether the above said CAS-4 could be applied to all pending assessments. It is observed from the above cited circular of the Board that the principles of CAS costing are to be adopted w.e.f, 13.2.2003 and therefore the assessments pending finalization on 13.02.2003 will also be covered under CAS-4. Assessments already finalized prior to 13.02.2003 on the basis of Board’s Circular 258/92/96 CX dated 30.10.96 are not required to be reopened. The field officers in this Commissionerates have been advised accordingly. Kindly confirm.’

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles