Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Reassessment order u/s 147 without first disposing of the preliminary objections raised by the assessee can not be sustained and is this liable to be quashed

CA Paras Dawar
Reassessment Order Invalid if Preliminary Objections Ignored Under Section 147, Reinforced by Recent Court Ruling The reassessment order under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act cannot be sustained if the assessing officer fails to dispose of the preliminary objections raised by the assessee. The Supreme Court in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO established that upon receiving a notice under Section 148, the assessee can request the reasons for the notice and file objections. These objections must be addressed through a speaking order before proceeding with reassessment. The Gujarat High Court in MGM Exports v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax reinforced this requirement, quashing a reassessment order that did not adhere to this procedure. (AI Summary)

Supreme Court in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. vs. ITO and Ors. 2002 (11) TMI 7 - SUPREME Court had devised the process to be followed while carrying out assessment u/s 147 . It clarified that when a notice u/s 148 is issued, the assessee upon submission of return of income can claim reasons for issue of notice u/s 148, which the assessing officer is bound to submit within a reasonable period. Upon receipt of the reasons, assessee has the right to file his objections to the issuance of notice u/s 147.The assessing officer is bound to dispose off such objections by way of a speaking order.

However, it has sometimes been observed that assessing officers, without first disposing off assessee's objection by way of a separate speaking order, have proceeded with assessment proceedings.

The question under consideration is 'What is the legal standing of the assessment proceedings which have been completed in violation of the procedure set by Supreme Court in aforementioned case ?' Or to be more specific, 'whether assessing officer can proceed with assessment proceedings without first disposing of the preliminary objections raised by the assessee ?'

Gujarat High Court while addressing this issue in the case of MGM EXPORTS vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2009 (3) TMI 64 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT held that :-

  1. The Court has come to the conclusion that the position in law was well-settled and the AO is accordingly required to decide the preliminary objections and pass a speaking order disposing of the objections raised by the petitioner. That until such a speaking order is passed, the AO cannot undertake reassessment.
  2. Applying the aforesaid settled legal position to the facts of the case it is apparent that the action of the respondent authority in framing the reassessment order, without first disposing of the preliminary objections raised by the petitioner, cannot be sustained.
  3. Accordingly, the reassessment order dt. 16th Dec., 2008 is hereby quashed and set aside and the respondent authority shall dispose of the preliminary objections by passing a speaking order and only thereafter proceed with the reassessment proceedings in accordance with law.

(For any feedback, comment or suggestion author may be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles